[yeah that last part is kind of. the point. that's the amaurotism baybey.]
... I do not think it such a bad thing to risk dying for the community. And I'm sure you understand why. Unity has always been important to our people, hasn't it?
As I see it, the problem with you starting out so strong is that it sent a message to everyone else that it's fine to do this. And no one could be sure who else would or would not follow suit, and so almost everyone did in a mad bid for survival. That certainly was why we did it. We would not have, had you not chosen to play like that. And I do think your reputation would have been better - or at the very least, I would not have found any fault with your reasoning. I would not have objected even if you'd chosen a good three quarters in the first round. You would have left others a fighting chance for a win while securing a good one for yourself.
Bad End was predictable, in my eyes. Ever since Wed, Bed, Behead they've sworn to be more ruthless to protect themselves.
Re: 378?
... I do not think it such a bad thing to risk dying for the community. And I'm sure you understand why. Unity has always been important to our people, hasn't it?
As I see it, the problem with you starting out so strong is that it sent a message to everyone else that it's fine to do this. And no one could be sure who else would or would not follow suit, and so almost everyone did in a mad bid for survival. That certainly was why we did it. We would not have, had you not chosen to play like that. And I do think your reputation would have been better - or at the very least, I would not have found any fault with your reasoning. I would not have objected even if you'd chosen a good three quarters in the first round. You would have left others a fighting chance for a win while securing a good one for yourself.
Bad End was predictable, in my eyes. Ever since Wed, Bed, Behead they've sworn to be more ruthless to protect themselves.